Advanced

Revised Geneva Score Calculator — Pulmonary Embolism Pre-test Probability

The Revised Geneva Score stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pre-test probability for pulmonary embolism using eight objective, bedside-measurable clinical variables — no arterial blood gas or d-dimer required for scoring.

Age > 65 years (+1)

Previous DVT or PE (+3)

Surgery or fracture within 1 month (+2)

Active malignancy (+2)

Unilateral lower limb pain (+3)

Hemoptysis (+2)

Heart rate

Lower limb deep vein palpation pain + unilateral edema (+4)

Revised Geneva Score
0

Range 0–22: Low (0–3), Intermediate (4–10), High (≥ 11)

Low PE probability (~8%)
Age > 65
0
Previous DVT/PE
0
Surgery / fracture
0
Malignancy
0
Unilateral limb pain
0
Hemoptysis
0
Heart rate
0
DVT palpation + edema
0
PE probability range: Low
Step by step
  1. 1

    Clinical history points

    age(0) + DVT/PE(0) + surgery(0) + malignancy(0) = 0
  2. 2

    Symptom & examination points

    limb pain(0) + hemoptysis(0) + DVT palpation(0) = 0
  3. 3

    Heart rate points

    0
    <75 bpm → 0, 75–94 bpm → 3, ≥95 bpm → 5.
  4. 4

    Revised Geneva Score

    0 + 0 + 0 = 0
Results are estimates for general information only and are not professional advice — always verify important results independently before relying on them. This is not medical, health or fitness advice; consult a qualified healthcare professional. Read the full disclaimer.
Quick answer

How does this calculator work?

Sum eight clinical variables (age >65, prior DVT/PE, recent surgery/fracture, malignancy, limb pain, hemoptysis, heart rate, DVT palpation/edema) into a score of 0–22. Score 0–3 = low PE probability (~8%); 4–10 = intermediate (~28%); ≥11 = high (~74%). No physician-judgment items — all variables are objectively measured.

Formula
Score = age(+1) + prior DVT/PE(+3) + surgery/fracture(+2) + malignancy(+2) + limb pain(+3) + hemoptysis(+2) + HR 75–94(+3) or ≥95(+5) + DVT palpation/edema(+4)
How this is calculated

The Revised Geneva Score (Klok et al. 2008) is a validated, fully standardised clinical decision rule for estimating the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism. Unlike the Wells PE score, it contains no physician-judgment item — every variable is objectively measurable at the bedside. The eight criteria are summed: scores 0–3 correspond to low probability (~8% PE prevalence), 4–10 to intermediate probability (~28%), and ≥11 to high probability (~74%).

The score is best used in conjunction with d-dimer testing under PERC/YEARS algorithms or directly to guide imaging decisions. In low-probability patients with a negative sensitive d-dimer, PE can often be excluded without CT pulmonary angiography. The score does not replace clinical judgment or account for hemodynamic instability; patients with suspected massive PE should proceed to imaging regardless of score.

Limitations: validated primarily in emergency department populations with suspected PE; accuracy may differ in inpatients or atypical presentations. Prevalence probabilities cited (~8%, ~28%, ~74%) are approximate values from the original validation cohort.

Frequently asked questions

The Wells PE score includes a subjective "PE more likely than alternative diagnosis" item worth 3 points, making it examiner-dependent. The Revised Geneva Score uses only objective, standardised variables, reducing inter-observer variability and making it easier to apply consistently across clinicians.

A low score (0–3) reduces PE probability to ~8% but does not rule it out alone. Combined with a negative high-sensitivity d-dimer (or a negative PERC rule in suitable patients), PE can generally be excluded without CT imaging. Always apply within your clinical context and local pathway.

A score ≥11 places the patient in high pre-test probability. Guidelines recommend proceeding directly to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) rather than waiting for d-dimer, as a negative d-dimer alone is not sufficient to exclude PE in high-probability patients. Anticoagulation should be considered while imaging is arranged if clinical suspicion is strong.

Also known as

revised geneva score pe
pulmonary embolism pre-test probability
pe probability score calculator
dvt pe clinical decision rule
geneva score thromboembolism
revised geneva pe risk
pe pre-test clinical score

APA

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. (2026). Revised Geneva Score Calculator — Pulmonary Embolism Pre-test Probability [Online calculator]. TG we-Calculate. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/revised-geneva-score-calculator

Chicago

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. "Revised Geneva Score Calculator — Pulmonary Embolism Pre-test Probability." TG we-Calculate. 2026. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/revised-geneva-score-calculator.

IEEE

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team, "Revised Geneva Score Calculator — Pulmonary Embolism Pre-test Probability," TG we-Calculate, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://we-calculate.com/calculator/revised-geneva-score-calculator

BibTeX

@misc{wecalculate_revised_geneva_score_calculator, title = {Revised Geneva Score Calculator — Pulmonary Embolism Pre-test Probability}, author = {{TG we-Calculate Editorial Team}}, howpublished = {\url{https://we-calculate.com/calculator/revised-geneva-score-calculator}}, year = {2026}, note = {TG we-Calculate} }

Did this calculator help you?