Intermediate

Remote vs On-Site Workers Cost Calculator

Enter the salary and overhead costs for both remote and on-site workers to see which model costs less — and by how much — per employee and across your whole team.

USD/yr

Base salary — assumed the same for both models
Team size to scale total costs

USD/mo

Monthly allowance paid to remote workers for internet, desk, etc.

USD/yr

Laptop, peripherals and other hardware per remote employee

USD/yr

Video conferencing, project management, security software, etc. per employee

USD/yr

Rent, utilities and overhead allocated per on-site employee

USD/yr

Transit passes, parking subsidies or commute reimbursement per employee

USD/yr

Cleaning, maintenance, coffee/snacks, reception — per employee

USD/yr

Desk equipment, monitors and peripherals per on-site employee
Annual savings — Remote is cheaper
61,000

$61,000 total savings across 10 employees ($6,100/employee/year)

Remote — cost per employee
$63,400
On-site — cost per employee
$69,500
Remote — total annual cost
$634,000
On-site — total annual cost
$695,000
Remote — overhead (excl. salary)$3,400
On-site — overhead (excl. salary)$9,500
Step by step
  1. 1

    Remote overhead per employee

    1,200 + 1,000 + 1,200 = 3,400
    Annual home-office stipend + equipment + SaaS (salary excluded).
  2. 2

    On-site overhead per employee

    6,000 + 1,200 + 1,500 + 800 = 9,500
  3. 3

    Overhead difference per employee

    |9,500 − 3,400| = 6,100
  4. 4

    Total annual savings

    6,100 × 10 = 61,000
Lock the current result, then change any input to compare scenarios.
Results are estimates for general information only and are not professional advice — always verify important results independently before relying on them. This is not financial, investment or tax advice; consult a qualified professional. Read the full disclaimer.
Quick answer

How does this calculator work?

Remote total cost per employee = salary + home stipend + equipment + software. On-site total cost = salary + office rent/person + commute benefit + facilities + equipment. The annual saving = (on-site − remote) × headcount. In 2025 typical ranges: remote overhead ~$3,000–5,000/yr vs. on-site overhead ~$8,000–15,000/yr per employee — all figures are editable estimates.

Formula
Remote cost = salary + home stipend + equipment + software • On-site cost = salary + office rent + commute benefit + facilities + equipment
How this is calculated

The true cost of an employee goes well beyond salary. Remote workers incur home-office stipends (typically $50–$200/month), collaboration software licences and possibly a higher equipment budget to cover monitors and ergonomic setup at home. On-site workers add office-space rent allocated per person (typically $3,000–$12,000/year in major cities), commute subsidies, and facilities costs (cleaning, utilities, snacks, reception) that scale with headcount.

This calculator uses 2025 editable estimates — all figures are illustrative defaults that you should replace with your own data. Note that salary itself is often different between the two models: remote roles may attract candidates from lower-cost areas willing to accept below-market rates, or may require a premium to compensate for isolation; adjust the salary field accordingly. Recruiting costs, productivity differences and turnover costs are not included here but can be significant.

The comparison outputs the per-employee and total team cost for each model, plus the annual savings from choosing the cheaper option. Typical results show remote workers cost $3,000–$8,000 less per year once office overhead is removed, but savings vary widely by location, industry and role type.

Frequently asked questions

Office overhead per person typically includes: allocated rent ($/sq ft × sq ft per person), electricity and utilities, building maintenance, office supplies, coffee and snacks, reception and security staff, and often an equipment allowance. In expensive cities like New York or London this can exceed $15,000/employee/year.

In most studies, remote workers cost less in total overhead — the savings in office space usually exceed the cost of stipends and software. However, some organisations find productivity losses, higher turnover or collaboration costs partially offset those savings. This calculator focuses on direct measurable costs; the intangibles depend on your specific team and culture.

Yes, if applicable. Many companies pay location-adjusted salaries for remote workers (higher in expensive cities, lower in cheaper regions). If your remote workforce is in a lower cost-of-living area, reduce the salary for the remote scenario — this often makes remote even more cost-effective.

Also known as

remote vs on-site worker cost
work from home cost comparison
cost of remote employees calculator
office space cost per employee
remote worker overhead calculator
hybrid work cost comparison
in-person vs remote employee cost

APA

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. (2026). Remote vs On-Site Workers Cost Calculator [Online calculator]. TG we-Calculate. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/remote-vs-on-location-workers-calculator

Chicago

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team. "Remote vs On-Site Workers Cost Calculator." TG we-Calculate. 2026. https://we-calculate.com/calculator/remote-vs-on-location-workers-calculator.

IEEE

TG we-Calculate Editorial Team, "Remote vs On-Site Workers Cost Calculator," TG we-Calculate, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://we-calculate.com/calculator/remote-vs-on-location-workers-calculator

BibTeX

@misc{wecalculate_remote_vs_on_location_workers_calculator, title = {Remote vs On-Site Workers Cost Calculator}, author = {{TG we-Calculate Editorial Team}}, howpublished = {\url{https://we-calculate.com/calculator/remote-vs-on-location-workers-calculator}}, year = {2026}, note = {TG we-Calculate} }

Did this calculator help you?